Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest)AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 17/100 | 33/100 | 42/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 60/100 | 80/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
200K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$5.00/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
1.2M
Completed sessions
20,700
21,218,628
Token share
0%
15.6%
Tokens
00%
140T+100%
No trend data
AUG 8OCT 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
58.4%102K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 4.5 (latest) vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 4.5 (latest)·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 4.5 (latest) vs Jamba LargeClaude Haiku 4.5 (latest)·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba Large