GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Kimi K3

  1. Kimi K2 Thinking TurboMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder27/10061/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Kimi K3100/100100/10012/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.15/ 1M
$3.00/ 1M
Output
$8.00/ 1M
$15/ 1M
Cached input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
463K
Completed sessions
No usage
715,867
Token share
No usage
0.11%
Tokens
No usage
1T-4%
No trend data
AUG 8OCT 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
36.4%61K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.